PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN METAPHORICAL THINKING PADA SISWA SMP

Fitriani Fitriani

doi:10.59098/mega.v1i1.177

Fitriani Fitriani Tadris Matematika, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan, IAI Muhammadiyah Sinjai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59098/mega.v1i1.177

Keywords: Learning, Metaphorical Thinking, Junior High Students

Abstract

This study was designed to describe the application of mathematics learning with metaphorical thinking in junior high school students. Mathematical learning with metaphorical thinking consists of six learning steps, namely foundation, connecting, compressed conflict, direct analogy, producing analogies, and applications. This research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of this research is all eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 15 Yogyakarta consisting of ten classes. Data collection techniques in this study is a test. The data in this study used a proportion test and paired sample tests with normal approximations. The results obtained are the method of learning mathematics with effective metaphorical thinking in junior high school students.

References

Afrilianto, M. (2012). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep dan kompetensi strategis matematis siswa smp dengan pendekatan metaphorical thinking. Infinity, 1 (2), 192-202

Arizka, R U. (2014). Keefektifan pembelajaran dengan metaphorical thinking ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan penalaran matematika, dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMP. Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Boreo, P., Bazzinim L., & Garutu R. (2001). Metaphors in teaching and learning mathematics: a case study concerning inequalities. Proceedings of PME 25, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2, 185-192.

Ferrara, F. (2003). Bridging perception and theory: What role can metaphors and imagery play? European research in mathematics education, 3, 1-9.

Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., & Hopkins, D. (2009). Models of learning tools for teaching (3rd Ed). New York: Open University Press.

Lai, M. Y. (2013). Constructing meanings of mathematical registers using metaphorical reasoning and models. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 15 (1), 29-47.

NCTM. Diambil dari www.nctm.org Nitko, A. J & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of student (6th). Boston: Pearson Education OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results in focus. PISA: OECD Publishing.

Setiawan, W. (2016). Profil Berpikir Metaforis (Metaphorical Thinking) Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pengukuran Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. KREANO (Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif), 7 (2), 208-216. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i2.7127.

Soviawati, E. (2011). Pendekatan matematika realistik (PMR) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir siswa di tingkat sekolah dasar.

Silver, H.F., Strong, R.W., & Perini, M.J. (2012). Strategi-strategi pengajaran. Memilih strategi bebasis penelitian yang tepat untuk setiap pembelajaran. (Terjemahan Elyys Tjo). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2007).

Vimala, A. (2012). School environment and academic achievement of standard IX students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in The World. 2 (3), 210-215.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar