Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 30, 2023
Accepted
Oct 26, 2023
Published
Oct 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 225 Download : 373

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the application of the direct instruction method in improving student ability to edit essay texts. Classroom Action Research was employed to get the data at Grade IX B, SMP Negeri 16 Kupang. The subject of this research was 30 students (15 male and 15 female). The research was carried out using two cycles which included the following steps: planning, action, observation, and reflection/analysis. Based on a study, the use of the Direct Learning Method can improve students' ability to find and correct spelling errors, word choice, sentence effectiveness, paragraph integration and discourse coherence. Based on observations in Cycle I and Cycle II, shows that the results obtained in Cycle I reached 40% learning completeness. Meanwhile, the results of Cycle II reached 80% of learning completeness.

Keywords

Editing text; Direct learning method

Article Details

How to Cite
Dile, U. (2023). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyunting Teks Karangan Dengan Metode Direct Instruction Kelas IX B SMP Negeri 16 Kupang. PENSOS : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pendidikan Sosiologi, 1(2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.59098/pensos.v1i2.1295

References

  1. Banele, S. D. (2023). The Students Cognitive Discrepancies in Artificial Intelligences Utilization: A Case Of Higher Learning Institutions. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 4(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I2.1203
  2. Birhan, W., Shiferaw, G., Amsalu, A., Tamiru, M., & Tiruye, H. (2021). Exploring the context of teaching character education to children in preprimary and primary schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSAHO.2021.100171
  3. Doherty, C., Dooley, K., & Woods, A. (2013). Teaching sociology within teacher education: Revisiting, realigning and re-embedding. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313504062
  4. García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.00140/BIBTEX
  5. Iraji, B., & Far, H. R. (2023). THE EFFECTS OF ŽIŽEKIAN READING OF VIOLENCE IN SHAKESPEARE’S HAMLET ON READERS. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 4(2), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I2.1170
  6. Kodi, O. N. (2021). The Probing-Prompting Method to Overcome the Monotonous Learning Process in Class. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 2(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I2.491
  7. Simanjuntak, S. A., & Lien, H.-N. (2021). Controversies and Possibilities of Teaching and Learning EIL Approach: A Case Study in Indonesia. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 7(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2021.7.1.279
  8. Syahrul. (2021). Integrating Pluralism and Multicultural Education to Prevent Radicalism at Universitas Muhammadiyah Kupang. Edukasia : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21043/EDUKASIA.V16I1.8285
  9. Syahrul, Arifin, & Datuk, A. (2021). The dilemma of Timorese education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Innovation in Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Opportunities, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003206019-28
  10. Syahrul, Zahrawati, F., & Nursaptini. (2023). Division of Labour in Coastal Community: The Equity of Role-Play Between Bugis Women and Men in Kupang. PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender, 15(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.21043/PALASTREN.V15I2.11837
  11. Tomlinson, M., Enders, J., & Naidoo, R. (2018). The Teaching Excellence Framework: symbolic violence and the measured market in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 61(5), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1553793