Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aims to review several articles from Google Scholar about the implementation of the learning stick method in sociology. The article criteria were published in 2015-2020. The study showed that the Talking Stick model does not only improve the students` stick outcomes, but it can also produce the students` abilities in critical thinking, communication skills, cooperative abilities, and problem-solving abilities. The students can exchange their ideas with friends, which makes the students more active in stick because they are in stick to provide information about the material being studied.

Keywords

Talking Stick Model; Learning outcomes

Article Details

How to Cite
Kodi, Y. I. (2023). Study Literature Hasil Belajar Sosiologi dengan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick. PENSOS : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pendidikan Sosiologi, 1(2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.59098/pensos.v1i2.1301

References

  1. Adur, K. (2022). Knowing Critical Thinking in Two Stray Learning Model. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 3(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V3I1.642
  2. Anggraini, G., & Asrin, A. (2021). Development of Interactive Learning Media to Improve Learning Local Script in Sumbawa. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I1.303
  3. Banele, S. D. (2023). THE STUDENTS COGNITIVE DISCREPANCIES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES UTILIZATION: A CASE OF HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 4(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I2.1203
  4. Carlin, A. P. (2010). The Corpus Status of Literature in Teaching Sociology: Novels as “Sociological Reconstruction.” American Sociologist, 41(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9096-8
  5. Ciabattari, T. (2013). Creating a Culture of Good Writing: A Cumulative Model for Teaching Writing in the Sociology Major. Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12462415
  6. Doherty, C., Dooley, K., & Woods, A. (2013). Teaching sociology within teacher education: Revisiting, realigning and re-embedding. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313504062
  7. Eglitis, D. S., Buntman, F. L., & Alexander, D. V. (2016). Social Issues and Problem-based Learning in Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16643572
  8. Forsey, M. (2014). Learning to Stay? Mobile Modernity and the Sociology of Choice. Mobilities, 10(5), 764–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.927202
  9. García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.00140/BIBTEX
  10. Harley, K., & Natalier, K. (2013). Teaching sociology - reflections on the discipline. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313504049
  11. Mandut, L. A., Syahrul, Beni, W. H. T., & Arifin. (2021). Tradisi Wuat Wai (Bekal Perjalanan) sebelum Melanjutkan Pendidikan di Manggarai, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 7(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.32884/IDEAS.V7I2.340
  12. Mardon, A., & Ahmed, R. (2023). THE EDUCATION GAP IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES: CANADA’S REALITY. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 4(2), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.59098/socioedu.v4i2.1181
  13. Maswi, R. Z., Syahrul, & Datuk, A. (2022). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Sosiologi di Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bahri Ternate Kabupaten Alor. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 2395–2402. https://doi.org/10.31004/EDUKATIF.V4I2.2459
  14. Molina, M., & Garip, F. (2019). Machine Learning for Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-073117-041106
  15. Rahmawati, & Imrayani. (2023). The Role of Sociology Teacher in Overcoming Students’ Learning Difficulties at SMA Negeri 2 Sambi Rampa. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I1.873
  16. Sari Inda Momay, I., & Tukang, B. (2023). The Teacher’s Role in Internalizing Local Wisdom Values at SMA PGRI Kupang. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 4(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I1.872
  17. Syahrul, Arifin, & Datuk, A. (2021). The dilemma of Timorese education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Innovation in Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Opportunities, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003206019-28
  18. Syahrul, Arifin, Datuk, A., Almu, F. F., & Ramlah, ST. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berorientasi Literasi Kearifan Lokal di Mas Al-Hikmah Soe Nusa Tenggara Timur. JPM (Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 4(2), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.21067/JPM.V4I2.3628
  19. Syahrul, & Datuk, A. (2020). Social Behavior of The Children of Newspaper Sellers in Kupang City to Defend Existential at School. NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam, 17(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.19105/NUANSA.V17I2.3299
  20. Syahrul, & Hajenang. (2021). Reflections on Multicultural Education for Non-Muslim Students at Muhammadiyah University, Kupang. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 12(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.31603/TARBIYATUNA.V12I1.3593
  21. Syahrul, & Kibtiyah, M. (2020). Problematika Pendidikan Anak Jalanan : (Studi Anak Penjual Koran di Kota Kupang). Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1336–1349. https://doi.org/10.31004/BASICEDU.V4I4.531
  22. Syahrul, & Wardana, A. (2017). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan untuk anak jalanan di Kota Yogyakarta. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 4(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.21831/HSJPI.V4I2.10388
  23. Syahrul, Zahrawati, F., & Nursaptini. (2022). Kritik Ideologi Pendidikan. Parepare: IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press. Retrieved from http://repository.iainpare.ac.id/4044/