Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 17, 2023
Accepted
Oct 26, 2023
Published
Oct 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 80 Download : 133

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to find out the strategy of problem-solving conducted at SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. This research uses qualitative methods. The subjects in this study were students at SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques used data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. The results of this research show that the strategy for solving the problem of learning loss among students after the COVID-19 pandemic at SMA Negeri 5 is that teachers can use methods that can be applied without having to gather and have physical contact, such as inquiry methods, case studies, problem-solving, recitation, and so on. By interacting a lot, it is hoped that it can help strengthen students' communication skills and create emotional closeness between fellow students and the teacher.

Keywords

Problem-solving strategy, Students

Article Details

How to Cite
Naga, M. F. (2023). Strategi Pemecahan Masalah Learning Loss pada Peserta Didik Setelah Pandemi COVID-19 di SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. PENSOS : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pendidikan Sosiologi, 1(2), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.59098/pensos.v1i2.1303

References

  1. Anggraini, Gina, and Asrin Asrin. 2021. “Development of Interactive Learning Media to Improve Learning Local Script in Sumbawa.” SocioEdu: Sociological Education 2(1):1–8. https://doi: 10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I1.303
  2. Bacotang, Abustam, Pewennari Hijjang, and Darman Manda. 2016. “Migration And Economic Changes: Sociological Analysis on the Contributions of Bugis Ethnic for the Economy of Kupang.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/MJSS.2016.V7N2S1P147
  3. Djehalut, Nomesio Suryanto, Burhan Kiko, Nurdin, and Syahrul. 2022. “Peran Ibu Rumah Tangga Sebagai Pendamping Belajar Anak Di Masa Pandemik Covid 19 Di Kota Kupang.” Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya 8(3):1013–20. https://doi.org/10.32884/IDEAS.V8I3.936
  4. Eglitis, Daina S., Fran L. Buntman, and Dameon V. Alexander. 2016. “Social Issues and Problem-Based Learning in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology 44(3):212–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16643572
  5. García-Carrión, Rocío, Garazi López de Aguileta, Maria Padrós, and Mimar Ramis-Salas. 2020. “Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning.” Frontiers in Psychology 11:140. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.00140/BIBTEX
  6. Kathleen Thomas, M., Priyanka Singh, and Kristin Klopfenstein. 2015. “Arts Education and the High School Dropout Problem.” Journal of Cultural Economics 39(4):327–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10824-014-9238-X/METRICS
  7. Luna, Yvonne M., and Stephanie A. Winters. 2017. “‘Why Did You Blend My Learning?’ A Comparison of Student Success in Lecture and Blended Learning Introduction to Sociology Courses.” Teaching Sociology 45(2):116–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16685373
  8. Maswi, Rabia Z., Syahrul, and Amirulah Datuk. 2022. “Teori Konstruktivisme Dalam Pembelajaran Sosiologi Di Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bahri Ternate Kabupaten Alor.” EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN 4(2):2395–2402. https://doi.org/10.31004/EDUKATIF.V4I2.2459
  9. Molina, Mario, and Filiz Garip. 2019. “Machine Learning for Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 45:27–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-073117-041106
  10. Oematan, Absalom, and Wering Martha Kamau. 2023. “Changes in Students’ Learning Behavior in The Covid-19 Pandemic Era SMA Kristen Kapan.” SocioEdu: Sociological Education 4(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I1.874
  11. Simanjuntak, Susi Andriani, and Hsi-Nancy Lien. 2020. “Teaching and Learning EIL Approach: A Case Study in Indonesia.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3661301
  12. Sorokin, Pavel. 2017. “Vision and Mission of Sociology: Learning from the Russian Historical Experience.” American Sociologist 48(2):135–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12108-016-9303-3/METRICS
  13. Strand, Steve. 2014. “School Effects and Ethnic, Gender and Socio-Economic Gaps in Educational Achievement at Age 11.” Oxford Review of Education 40(2):223–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.891980
  14. Syahrul, Arifin, and A. Datuk. 2021. “The Dilemma of Timorese Education in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Educational Innovation in Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Opportunities 151–56. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003206019-28
  15. Syahrul, Fawziah Zahrawati, and Nursaptini. 2023. “Division of Labour in Coastal Community: The Equity of Role-Play Between Bugis Women and Men in Kupang.” PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender 15(2):255–74. https://doi.org/10.21043/PALASTREN.V15I2.11837
  16. Un, Safrida. 2023. “Strategi Adaptasi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas Pada Masa COVID-19 Di SMA Negeri 5 Kupang.” PENSOS : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pendidikan Sosiologi 1(1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.59098/PENSOS.V1I1.940
  17. Vergés Bosch, Núria, Leon Freude, and Clara Camps Calvet. 2021. “Service Learning with a Gender Perspective: Reconnecting Service Learning with Feminist Research and Pedagogy in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology 49(2):136–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X21993465