Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 29, 2024
Accepted
Nov 2, 2024
Published
Nov 7, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 26 Download : 16

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the implementation of a group investigation learning at SMA Kristen Kapan. The study showed the number of students’ learning outcomes at the pre-cycle meeting, which had a total value of 2,060 and an average of 68.66. In cycle I, the number of values was 2,205 and an average of 73.51. Meanwhile, in cycle II, the number of values was 2,495 and an average of 83.16. These results have achieved the criteria of success set by the researcher, which is 80% above the criteria of success 75.

Keywords

Group Investigation Learning, Sociology

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Toto, A. (2024). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Sosiologi. PENSOS : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pendidikan Sosiologi, 2(2), 145-147. https://doi.org/10.59098/pensos.v2i2.1757

References

  1. Bhushan, R. (2011). The sociology of language teaching and learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 309–311. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.309-311
  2. Bryan, A. (2016). The sociology classroom as a pedagogical site of discomfort: Difficult knowledge and the emotional dynamics of teaching and learning. Irish Journal of Sociology, 24(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603516629463
  3. Freed, C. R. (2011). Teaching and Learning Guide for: In the Spirit of Selden Bacon: The Sociology of Drinking and Drug Problems. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00347.x
  4. Hogan, V., & Daniell, L. (2012). Creating an environment for active, relational learning and teaching educational sociology in large classes. New Zealand Sociology, 27(1), 132–139.
  5. Huang, J.-L., & Wu, C.-Y. (2022). Content and Language Integrated Learning for Teaching the Theoretical Language of Sociology of Education to Preservice Teachers: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 67(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0009
  6. Lamit, W. A., Matzin, R., Jawawi, R., Shahrill, M., Jaidin, J. H., & Mundia, L. (2017). Utilizing an online discussion tool in teaching and learning sociology. International Journal of Humanities Education, 15(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/cgp/v15i02/1-16
  7. McKinney, K. (2018). The Integration of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning into the Discipline of Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 46(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X17735155
  8. Nathenson, S. L. (2011). Experiential learning, blogging, and teaching sociology: An integrative model. Ubiquitous Learning, 3(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v03i02/40277
  9. Sin, C. (2014). Epistemology, sociology, and learning and teaching in physics. Science Education, 98(2), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21100
  10. Syahrul, Arifin, Datuk, A., Almu, F. F., & Ramlah, ST. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berorientasi Literasi Kearifan Lokal di Mas Al-Hikmah Soe Nusa Tenggara Timur. JPM (Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 4(2), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.21067/JPM.V4I2.3628
  11. Syahrul, & Datuk, A. (2018). Perilaku Sosial Anak Penjual Koran di Kota Kupang dalam Mempertahankan Eksistensinya di Sekolah. Dimensia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi, 7(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.21831/DIMENSIA.V7I2.32651
  12. Syahrul, & Hajenang. (2021). Reflections on Multicultural Education for Non-Muslim Students at Muhammadiyah University, Kupang. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 12(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.31603/TARBIYATUNA.V12I1.3593
  13. Syahrul, Yusuf, N. W., Julyyanti, Y., Nautu, A. K., & Arifin. (2023). Pembelajaran Sosiologi Secara Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pendidikan IPS, 17(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.21067/JPPI.V17I2.7462
  14. Wood, C. V. (2011). Teaching and Learning Guide for: “The Sociologies of Knowledge, Science, and Intellectuals: Distinctive Traditions and Overlapping Perspectives.” Sociology Compass, 5(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00349.x