Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 24, 2023
Published
Oct 28, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 121 Download : 236

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe (1) the gender gap in women's access to education in Umalor Village, and (2) to describe the factors that cause gender gaps in women's access to education in Umalor Village. The type of this research was descriptive qualitative, and data collection methods used observation, interviews, and documentation. The research subjects were village heads, parents and children who did not continue their education to a higher level. The analysis technique of the data used data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study are (1) women's education is secondary (subordination), compared to men; (2) women's education is marginalised and given less attention (marginalization) because women only take care of domestic needs; (3) there is labelling (stereotypes) given to women as creatures who are weak and unable to lead themselves; and (4) women's workload is more than men's work, namely women who have to work in the house and outside the house. Meanwhile, the factors that cause gender gaps in women's access to education include (1) cultural tradition factors that prohibit and limit women's rights and obligations to access education, (2) patrilineal cultural factors that consider men to be more capable than women, and (3) the economic limitation factor so that boys are sent to school earlier than girls.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bria, F. Y. (2023). FAKTOR PENYEBAB KESENJANGAN GENDER PADA PEREMPUAN DALAM MENDAPATKAN PENDIDIKAN DI KABUPATEN MALAKA. Prosiding Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1, 19-29. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unmuhkupang.ac.id/index.php/pps/article/view/1310

References

  1. Andersen, M. L. (1988). Moving Our Minds: Studying Women of Color and Reconstructing Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 16(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1317412
  2. Alisa, W. (2022). Fenomenologi Kesejangan Gender dalam mengenyam Pendidikan: Studi tentang kesenjangan gender di Dedas Cibuntu, kecamatan Wanayasa, Kabupaten Purwakarta. Doctoral Dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
  3. Banele, S. D. (2023). THE STUDENTS COGNITIVE DISCREPANCIES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES UTILIZATION: A CASE OF HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 4(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I2.1203
  4. Chaerunnisyah, I. (2016). Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Kesetaraan Gender di Desa Buku Kecamatan Mapilli Kabupaten Polewali Mandar Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar).
  5. Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Moschion, J. (2017). Gender gaps in early educational achievement. Journal of Population Economics, 30(4), 1093–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00148-017-0638-Z/TABLES/8
  6. Dimitrov, D. M. (1999). Gender Differences in Science Achievement: Differential Effect of Ability, Response Format, and Strands of Learning Outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1949-8594.1999.TB17507.X
  7. Hsieh, H. C., Chen, P. Y., & Lin, T. Sen. (2017). Girls’ & boys’ science choices & learning in upper-secondary schools in Taiwan. Asian Women, 33(3), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.14431/AW.2017.09.33.3.41
  8. Isram. (2020). Belenggu Budaya Patriarki terhadap Kesetaraan Gender di Indonesia. https://www.its.ac.id/news/2020/04/22/belenggu-budaya-patriarki-terhadap-kesetaraan-gender-di-Indonesia/. di Akses pada tanggal 25 Januari 2023.
  9. Julyyanti, Y., Yusuf, N. W., Saldika, S. D., Syahrul, & Ramlah, S. (2022). Dilema Usaha Rasional Orangtua dalam Menumbuhkan Kesadaran Pendidikan pada Anak di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Journal on Teacher Education, 4(1), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.31004/JOTE.V4I1.5842
  10. Maguire, L. K., Niens, U., McCann, M., & Connolly, P. (2015). Emotional development among early school-age children: gender differences in the role of problem behaviours. Educational Psychology, 36(8), 1408–1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1034090
  11. Moss, G., & Washbrook, L. (2016). Understanding the Gender Gap in Literacy and Language Development. London, UK.
  12. Strand, S. (2014). School effects and ethnic, gender and socio-economic gaps in educational achievement at age 11. Oxford Review of Education, 40(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.891980
  13. Suparman. (2021). The Role-Play for Child Care in Familial Entrepreneur in Enrekang Regency. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 2(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I2.483
  14. Syahrul. (2017). Dilema Feminis Sebagai Reaksi Maskulin dalam Tradisi Pernikahan Bugis Makassar. AL-MAIYYAH : Media Transformasi Gender Dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan, 10(2), 313–334. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/almaiyah/article/view/510
  15. Syahrul. (2019). Internalisasi Pendidikan Multikultural dan Inklusif pada Anak Pengungsi Internasional di Kota Makassar. JPK (Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan), 4(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.24269/JPK.V4.N3.2019.PP25-34
  16. Syahrul, S., Datuk, A., & Bora, E. (2020). Tingkat Pendidikan Sebagai Penentu Takaran Belis pada Gadis Sumba. Al-Maiyyah: Media Transformasi Gender Dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan, 13(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.35905/AL-MAIYYAH.V13I2.721
  17. Syahrul, & Wardana, A. (2017). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan untuk anak jalanan di Kota Yogyakarta. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 4(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.21831/HSJPI.V4I2.10388
  18. Syahrul, Zahrawati, F., & Nursaptini. (2023). Division of Labour in Coastal Community: The Equity of Role-Play Between Bugis Women and Men in Kupang. PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender, 15(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.21043/PALASTREN.V15I2.11837
  19. Vergés Bosch, N., Freude, L., & Camps Calvet, C. (2021). Service Learning with a Gender Perspective: Reconnecting Service Learning with Feminist Research and Pedagogy in Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 49(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X21993465