Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this study were (a) to find out the lifestyle of students in using social media (Tik-tok), (b) to find out the impact of Tik-Tok social media on the lifestyle of students. The method used in this study was this research using qualitative method, with a descriptive approach, data collection techniques were carried out through interviews, observation, and documentation with sociology students and teachers. The results of this study show the first few findings, the lifestyle of students in using social media Tik-Tok students get positive values ​​can recommend in terms of dressing for themselves so that they can be outfit stylists in a positive context. Meanwhile, the negative context of the lifestyle of other students only tends to use Tik-Tok social media both in class and outside of school, so that teaching and learning activity decreases and grades greatly decrease. Second, the impact of Tik-Tok social media on student behavior, there are more negative impacts, such as students learning less, playing cellphones more than opening books. Students also don't care about the community environment, get together to discuss unnatural things, especially students are more likely to find out what will be broadcast on social media rather than the time to study.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ijung, L. (2023). PERUBAHAN GAYA HIDUP PESERTA DIDIK AKIBAT MEDIA SOSIAL DI SMA NEGERI 6 KOTA KUPANG. Prosiding Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1, 30-40. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unmuhkupang.ac.id/index.php/pps/article/view/1312

References

  1. Baehr, J. (2017). The Varieties of Character and Some Implications for Character Education. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10964-017-0654-Z/METRICS
  2. Bourdieu, P. (2018). The Sociology of Economic Life. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 78–92). USA: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=XmEPEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA78&dq=info:Pu6L0YDx2kUJ:scholar.google.com&ots=l3AuxzFyUK&sig=6gogmAgBLh47WBRueNmG2a-Orz8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  3. Chang, T.-S., Hsu, W.-T., & Wang, T.-W. (2016). Social Relationship Attitudes of Student-athletes toward Heterosexual, Gay, and Lesbian Peers in Taiwan. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2016/26239
  4. Lingard, B., Rawolle, S., & Taylor, S. (2005). Globalizing policy sociology in education: Working with Bourdieu. Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500238945
  5. Maguire, L. K., Niens, U., McCann, M., & Connolly, P. (2015). Emotional development among early school-age children: gender differences in the role of problem behaviours. Educational Psychology, 36(8), 1408–1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1034090
  6. Pane, M. M., & Patriana, R. (2016). The Significance of Environmental Contents in Character Education for Quality of Life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.05.153
  7. Parr, A. K., & Bonitz, V. S. (2015). Role of Family Background, Student Behaviors, and School-Related Beliefs in Predicting High School Dropout. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(6), 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.917256
  8. Pattaro, C. (2016). Character Education: Themes and Researches. An Academic Literature Review. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-1-2
  9. Peterson, A. (2019). Character education, the individual and the political. Journal of Moral Education, 49(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1653270
  10. Roumbanis, L. (2019). Symbolic Violence in Academic Life: A Study on How Junior Scholars are Educated in the Art of Getting Funded. Minerva, 57(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11024-018-9364-2/METRICS
  11. Sabang, J., & Idris. (2022a). Students’ Lifestyle Change in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 at SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 3(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V3I1.649
  12. Sabang, J., & Idris. (2022b). Students’ Lifestyle Change in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 at SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 3(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V3I1.649
  13. Sagalova, V., Nanama, S., Zagre, N. M., & Vollmer, S. (2021). Long-term consequences of early marriage and maternity in West and Central Africa: Wealth, education, and fertility. Journal of Global Health, 11, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.11.13004
  14. Singh, N. K., & Espinoza-Herold, M. (2014). Culture-Based Education: Lessons from Indigenous Education in the U.S. and Southeast Asia. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 5(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/26390043.2014.12067773
  15. Sumida Huaman, E. (2011). Transforming education, transforming society: The co-construction of critical peace education and Indigenous education. Journal of Peace Education, 8(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2011.621374
  16. Syahrul, & Datuk, A. (2020). Social Behavior of The Children of Newspaper Sellers in Kupang City to Defend Existential at School. NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam, 17(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.19105/NUANSA.V17I2.3299
  17. Syahrul, & Hajenang. (2021). Reflections on Multicultural Education for Non-Muslim Students at Muhammadiyah University, Kupang. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 12(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.31603/TARBIYATUNA.V12I1.3593
  18. Syahrul, & Kibtiyah, M. (2020). Problematika Pendidikan Anak Jalanan : (Studi Anak Penjual Koran di Kota Kupang). Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1336–1349. https://doi.org/10.31004/BASICEDU.V4I4.531
  19. Syahrul, S., Yusuf, N. W., Julyyanti, Y., Nautu, A. K., & Arifin. (2023). Pembelajaran Sosiologi Secara Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pendidikan IPS, 17(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.21067/JPPI.V17I2.7462
  20. Walker, D. I., Roberts, M. P., & Kristjánsson, K. (2014). Towards a new era of character education in theory and in practice. Educational Review, 67(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.827631