Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 20, 2023
Accepted
Aug 24, 2023
Published
Sep 1, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 573 Download : 349

Main Article Content

Abstract

The humanistic intellectual algorithmic nodes deployment on Artificial Intelligences (AIs) brought significances in undertaking socio-economics activities. Students in higher learning institutions utilized the AIs for education purposes leading to damages in the cognitive process. The phenomenography action research was purposively conducted to assess 113 higher learning institution students’ cognitive discrepancies due to AI utilization.  The objectives undertaken were to: assess the attributes leading students’ differences in AI utilization and determine the students cognitive discrepancies in performance resulted by utilization of AI in the learning process. Data were collected through students’ test-re-tested class activity worksheets observations and semi-structured interview. The major findings showed that students were highly rated in utilization of AI to save time, had cognitively worries and less authentic assurance. Also, the findings on students cognitive discrepancies utilization was proved to be ascertained on indicators for cognitive processes, individual differences, feedback and interaction, motivation and engagement, creativity and imagination. The recommendation were made to students and instructors to appropriate utilize and blend AI utilization in teaching and learning process for cognitive wealth so as to overwhelm shortfalls resulted by over utilization of AIs.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence; Cognitive; Discrepancies; Students.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Banele, S. D. (2023). THE STUDENTS COGNITIVE DISCREPANCIES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES UTILIZATION: A CASE OF HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 4(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.59098/socioedu.v4i2.1203

References

  1. Anwar, M.R., Oganda, F.P., Santoso, N.P.L. & Fa-bio, M., (2022). Artificial Intelligence that Exists in the Human Mind. International Transactions on Artificial Intelli-gence, 1(1), 28-42.
  2. Arbuckle, S. A., Pruszynski, J. A., & Diedrichsen, J. (2022). Mapping the integration of sensory information across fingers in human sensorimotor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(26), 5173-5185.
  3. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Edu-cation in the era of generative artificial in-telligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Available at SSRN 4337484.
  4. Baigang, M., & Yi, F. (2023). A review: develop-ment of named entity recognition (NER) technology for aeronautical information in-telligence. Artificial Intelligence Re-view, 56(2), 1515-1542.
  5. Britannica (23 February 2023). Artificial Ä°ntelli-gence. https:// www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence
  6. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Twenty years of personalized language learning. Educational Technology & Socie-ty, 24(1), 205-222.
  7. Chung, N. C. (2021). Human in the loop for ma-chine creativity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03569.
  8. De Garrido, L. (2022). Conceptual design of a crea-tive artificial intelligence system based on the neurocognitive bases of human creativi-ty in the brain. Creativity Research Jour-nal, 34(3), 273-294.
  9. Dey, N. (Ed.). (2023). Applied Genetic Algorithm and Its Variants: Case Studies and New Developments. Springer Nature.
  10. Divekar, R. R., Drozdal, J., Chabot, S., Zhou, Y., Su, H., Chen, Y., ... & Braasch, J. (2022). Foreign language acquisition via artificial intelligence and extended reality: design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Lan-guage Learning, 35(9), 2332-2360.
  11. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.
  12. Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant's impact on English lan-guage learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055.
  13. Gyll, S. P., & Hayes, H. (2021). Learning and indi-vidual differences in skilled competen-cy‐based performance: Using a course planning and learning tool as an indicator for student success. The Journal of Compe-tency‐Based Education, 6(3), e1259.
  14. Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Student feedback litera-cy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate stu-dents. Teaching in Higher Educa-tion, 26(2), 181-196.
  15. Happs, J. C. (1985). Cognitive learning theory and classroom complexity. Research in Science and Technology Education, 3, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514850030109a
  16. Haryana, M. R. A., Warsono, S., Achjari, D., & Nahartyo, E. (2022). Virtual reality learn-ing media with innovative learning materi-als to enhance individual learning outcomes based on cognitive load theory. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100657.
  17. Ivan, C., Chiru, I., & Arcos, R. (2021). A whole of society intelligence approach: critical reas-sessment of the tools and means used to counter information warfare in the digital age. Intelligence and National Securi-ty, 36(4), 495-511.
  18. Johnson, S. G., Bilovich, A., & Tuckett, D. (2023). Conviction narrative theory: A theory of choice under radical uncertain-ty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e82.
  19. Jokhan, A., Chand, A. A., Singh, V., & Mamun, K. A. (2022). Increased digital resource consumption in higher educational institutions and the artificial intelligence role in informing decisions related to student performance. Sustainability, 14(4), 2377.
  20. Kadam, S., & Vaidya, V. (2021). Cognitive evalua-tion of machine learning agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 66, 100-121.
  21. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large lan-guage models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
  22. Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2021). Teacher perspective on language competences relation to learn-ing difficulties in English learning. Journal Educational Verkenning, 2(1), 29-37.
  23. Kliestik, T., Novak, A., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2022). Live shopping in the metaverse: Visual and spatial analytics, cognitive artificial intelli-gence techniques and algorithms, and im-mersive digital simulations. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 21, 187-202.
  24. Li, B., & Li, W. (2023). Developing Students’ Game Competence: Situated Game Teach-ing through Set Plays. Strategies, 36(1), 31-39.
  25. Liaw, S. Y., Tan, J. Z., Lim, S., Zhou, W., Yap, J., Ratan, R., ... & Chua, W. L. (2023). Artifi-cial intelligence in virtual reality simulation for interprofessional communication train-ing: Mixed method study. Nurse Education Today, 122, 105718.
  26. Maj, S. P. (2021). Benchmarking educational quali-ty–an analysis and alternative practical learning theory and technology. ASCILITE Publications, 308-312.
  27. Pan, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, D., Shi, D., Wang, D., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2023). Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Educa-tion. Sustainability, 15(4), 3097.
  28. Poesia, G., & Goodman, N. D. (2023). Peano: learning formal mathematical reason-ing. Philosophical Transactions of the Roy-al Society A, 381(2251), 20220044.
  29. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391.
  30. Renzulli, J. (2023). The multiple menu model: A practical guide for developing differentiat-ed curriculum. Taylor & Francis.
  31. Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?. Critical care, 27(1), 1-5.
  32. Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620-631.
  33. Sharma, K., Lee-Cultura, S., & Giannakos, M. (2022). Keep calm and do not carry-forward: Toward sensor-data driven AI agent to enhance human learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 713176.
  34. Sineviciene, L., Hens, L., Kubatko, O., Melnyk, L., Dehtyarova, I., & Fedyna, S. (2021). Socio-economic and cultural effects of disruptive industrial technologies for sustainable development. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 43(2-3), 284-305.
  35. Srinivas, T., Mahalaxmi, G., Varaprasad, R., Don-ald, A. D., & Thippanna, G. (2022). AI in Transportation: Current and Promising Ap-plications. IUP Journal of Telecommunica-tions, 14(4).
  36. Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., ... & Teller, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: the one hundred year study on artifi-cial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06318.
  37. Sumakul, D. T., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in EFL class-rooms: Friend or foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Re-search Network, 15(1), 232-256.
  38. Tabbussum, R., & Dar, A. Q. (2021). Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence para-digms—artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(20), 25265-25282.
  39. Veale, M., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intel-ligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review Interna-tional, 22(4), 97-112.
  40. Wang, H., & Ma, S. (2022). Preventing crimes against public health with artificial intelli-gence and machine learning capabili-ties. Socio-Economic Planning Scienc-es, 80, 101043.
  41. Xue, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence for education and teaching. Wireless Com-munications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 1-10.
  42. Yan, C., de Lange, F. P., & Richter, D. (2023). Conceptual associations generate sensory predictions. Journal of Neurosci-ence, 43(20), 3733-3742.
  43. Yazdani-Asrami, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and big data techniques for the advancements of superconducting technology: a road to smarter and intelligent superconductivi-ty. Superconductor Science and Technolo-gy, 36(8), 084001.
  44. Zemčík, T. (2021). Failure of chatbot Tay was evil, ugliness and uselessness in its nature or do we judge it through cognitive shortcuts and biases?. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 361-367.
  45. Zhao, Y., Zhao, H., Ai, J., & Dong, Y. (2022). Ro-bust data-driven fault detection: An appli-cation to aircraft air data sen-sors. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2022.