Main Article Content

Abstract

This article is the result of a pedagogical project in the community of Santa Catarina, in northwestern Mexico. First, we analyze the theoretical implications of interculturality, in particular the concept of critical interculturality. In Latin America, critical interculturality has contributed to decolonial studies, creating a framework for understanding social relations within the framework of Modernity. We epistemically assume that critical interculturality emerges and is nourished by social movements. Critical interculturality is thus defined as an ongoing political project. Secondly, we present the Pa Ipai community of Santa Catarina, describing its historical and social conditions. We assume that as socio-educational researchers we must permanently question our methodology to avoid academic colonialism. Unfortunately, however, this is often reproduced when we consider community members as mere informants. Finally, we outline an overview of the objectives and procedures of the critical intercultural pedagogical project, followed by some reflections on the difficulties and results of said project. This proposal aims to understand interculturality as a process, a work in progress, where other forms of knowledge come into play. By creating a space away from traditional school environments, the backbone of the learning process is to involve students with a plurality of cultural manifestations that bring them closer to an ontological understanding of the other.

Keywords

Interculturality, Intercultural Education, Indigenous Communities, Educational Fieldwork

Article Details

How to Cite
González-Machado, E. C., & Santillán-Anguiano, E. I. (2024). CRITICAL INTERCULTURALITY AS AN EDUCATIONAL PROCESS EXPERIENCES IN AN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY IN NORTHWEST MEXICO. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 5(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.59098/socioedu.v5i2.1789

References

  1. Abel, K. (2022). Invisibility: Environmental Migration Governance in a Changing Climate. Oregon State University.
  2. Amsler, S., Kerr, J. & Andreotti, V. (2020). Interculturality in Teacher Education in Times of Unprecedented Global Challenges. Education and Society, 38(1), 13-37.
  3. Bokova, I. & Kulich, S. J. (2021). Advancing Intercultural Dialogue and Cooperation Internationally: Reviewing 75 Years of UNESCO’s Contributions. Journal of Intercultural Communication & Interactions Research 1(1), 25-54. https:/doi.org/10.3726/jicir.2021.1.0004
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1987). What Makes a Social Class? On The Theoretical and Practical Existence Of Groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035356
  5. Caetano, A. P., Freire, I. P., & Machado, E. B. (2020). Student Voice and Participation in Intercultural Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.1.458
  6. Carpenter, C. (2020). Power in Conservation: Environmental Anthropology Beyond Political Ecology (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324659
  7. Causadias, J. M. (2020). What is culture? Systems of people, places, and practices. Applied Developmental Science, 24(4), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.178936
  8. Cortina, R., & Earl, A. (2020). Embracing interculturality and Indigenous knowledge in Latin American higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(8), 1208–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1766350
  9. Dasli, M. (2018). UNESCO guidelines on intercultural education: a deconstructive reading. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1451913
  10. Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117733296
  11. Dervin, F. (2023). Interculturality, Criticality and Reflexivity in Teacher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Drousioti, K. (2022). Collective identities beyond homogenisation: implications for justice and education. Ethics and Education, 17(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2022.2102285
  13. Dussel, E. (2019). World-System and “Trans”-Modernity. Routledge.
  14. Filc, D. (2020). Is resistance always counter-hegemonic? Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1825281
  15. Fitz-Henry, E. (2021). Indigenous Peoples and Neo-extractivism in Latin America. In: Ness, I., Cope, Z. (Eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. González Machado, E. C., & Santillán-Anguiano, E. I. (2021). Prácticas educativas e interculturales como proceso formativo de jóvenes estudiantes de educación superior. Ciencia E Interculturalidad, 29(02), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.5377/rci.v29i02.13311
  17. Guzmán-Rosas, S. C. (2022). Ethnicity as a social determinant of energy poverty: the case of Mexican indigenous population. Local Environment, 27(9), 1075–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2100879
  18. Karasik, R. J. (2020). Community Partners’ Perspectives and the Faculty Role in Community-Based Learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825919892994
  19. Ladegaard, H. J., & Phipps, A. (2020). Intercultural research and social activism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1729786
  20. Leenknecht, M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L., Rikers, R., & Loyens, S. (2020). Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228
  21. Manathunga, C. (2020). Decolonising higher education: creating space for Southern knowledge systems. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 4(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v4i1.138