Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 28, 2025
Accepted
Aug 7, 2025
Published
Sep 22, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 51 Download : 21

Main Article Content

Abstract

The pervasive influence of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies in children's lives necessitates a balanced approach to parenting in the digital age. This article examines how to raise children who are technologically adept while maintaining their cognitive, social, and emotional well-being. Through a comprehensive literature review, we explore the dual impact of AI-driven tools on education and development, highlighting both their potential benefits such as personalized learning and enhanced problem-solving skills and their risks, including excessive screen time, privacy concerns, and reduced face-to-face interactions. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative insights from parents and educators with quantitative data on childrens tech usage patterns. Findings suggest that while AI can significantly enrich learning experiences, its unregulated use may hinder critical developmental milestones. We propose actionable strategies for parents to set healthy digital boundaries, for educators to integrate AI responsibly in classrooms, and for policymakers to enforce child-centric tech regulations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of fostering digital literacy alongside offline activities to ensure holistic child development. By bridging research and practical recommendations, this article contributes to the ongoing dialogue on nurturing well-rounded, tech-savvy children in an increasingly AI-driven world.

Keywords

AI and kids Healthy tech use Kids' data privacy Parenting in the digital age Ethical AI in schools

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Sayed Mahbub Hasan Amiri, Dhaka Residential Model College

Amiri, Sayed Mahbub Hasan is a dedicated and visionary professional committed to advancing education through innovation, technology, and collaborative leadership. With a passion for lifelong learning and a track record of excellence, he has established himself as a pivotal figure in curriculum development, digital content creation, and educational reform, both nationally and internationally. As a Master Trainer under the Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education in Bangladeshs Ministry of Education, Amiri has spearheaded curriculum design, digital content development, and Advanced ICT training programs, empowering educators to thrive in evolving technological landscapes. His expertise extends to authoring training manuals for Advanced ICT under the TQI-II project and crafting model secondary-level educational content, ensuring alignment with modern pedagogical standards. In recognition of his exceptional contributions, he earned the Best Content Developer Award on the Teachers Portal and were honored as a National Competition Winner by a2i (Access to Interface) under the Prime Ministers Office for pioneering educational solutions. A creative force in educational media, Amiri has authored content for Bangladeshs historical national newspaper, The Daily Ittefaq, and produced engaging video scripts and e-Learning tutorials for platforms like Muktopaath and a2i. His leadership in education was further celebrated with the Education Leadership Award 2018 from DSHE. Globally, he is acknowledged as a Microsoft Innovative Educator Expert (2018present), driving tech-integrated teaching practices, and holding credentials as a Google Registered App Developer, blending technical acumen with educational insight. Committed to fostering inclusive, future-ready learning environments, Amiri continues to bridge technology and education, inspiring educators and learners alike to embrace innovation. His work emblematizes a steadfast dedication to elevating educational quality, accessibility, and impact locally and beyond.

How to Cite
Amiri, S. M. H. (2025). RAISING TECH-SAVVY BUT BALANCED KIDS IN THE AI ERA. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 6(2), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.59098/socioedu.v6i2.2581

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (Novemver 1, 2016). Media and young minds. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591
  2. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
  3. Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on AI-based learning assistance. Computers & Education, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
  4. Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media. Body Image, 13, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002
  5. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2018). Cyberbullying: Identification and prevention. Journal of School Violence, 17(4), 1-15.
  6. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson. Open Ideas. ISBN: 978 0992424886.
  7. Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020). The ethics of research with children and young people (2nd ed.). Sage. Open Ideas. ISBN: ISBN: 9781529738469
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  10. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  11. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
  12. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
  13. Livingstone, S., Blum-Ross, A., Pavlick, J., & Ólafsson, K. (2017). In the digital home, how do parents support their children and who supports them? London School of Economics and Political Science. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/69858/
  14. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  15. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
  16. QSR International. (2020). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 12). https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
  17. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
  18. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
  19. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
  20. GDPR. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation. Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1-88. https://gdpr-info.eu/
  21. Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2020). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857
  22. Hiniker, A., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Kientz, J. A. (2016). Not at the dinner table: Parents' and children's perspectives on family technology rules. Proceedings of the ACM CSCW, 1376-1389. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940
  23. Kankaanranta, M., Koivula, M., & Laakso, M.-L. (2021). Digital media in early childhood education: The Finnish approach. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 10(1), 1-21. https://jecer.org/finland-digital-early-education/
  24. Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190874698.001.0001
  25. Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2018). The cost of interrupted work. Proceedings of the ACM CHI, 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072
  26. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038
  27. Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2020). The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research
  28. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious... Simon & Schuster.
  29. Uhls, Y. T., Ellison, N. B., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2021). Benefits and costs of social media in adolescence. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S67-S70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
  30. Rights Foundation. (2020). The Children's Design Code. https://5rightsfoundation.com/standards/the-design-code
  31. Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2019). Children's data and privacy online. New Media & Society, 21(3), 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818819616
  32. OECD. (2021). AI and the future of skills in education. https://www.oecd.org/education/ai-and-education-9d6b023a-en.htm
  33. Radesky, J., Hiniker, A., McLaren, C., & Ameen, M. (2020). Parent and child problematic media use: The role of maternal mental health. Pediatrics, 145(Supplement 2), S337-S346. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-2056G
  34. Tisseron, S. (2018). The 3-6-9-12 Rules for Happy Digital Education. Erès. https://doi.org/10.3917/eres.tisse.2018.01