Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 11, 2023
Accepted
May 20, 2023
Published
May 22, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 390 Download : 402

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study focuses on teachers' roles and factors that impede teachers' role in classroom management at SMA Taman Siswa Kodi Bangedo in Southwest Sumba Regency to optimize sociology learning. The objectives of this study were to determine the teacher's role in classroom management to optimize sociology learning and the impediments factors in classroom management. The qualitative research method was employed in this study. To collect the data, the researcher used observation, interviews, and documentation. Besides, data reduction, data presentation, and data verification are the data analysis techniques. The study indicates that the teacher's role in classroom management was; as a learning designer, a learning manager, a motivator, a facilitator, a counsellor, and as a curriculum implementer. Theoretically, the teacher must master the class and its management as a whole so that the learning process can achieve its goals. Whereas the obstacle regarding the teacher's role not only comes from the teacher but also the students themselves, both from the family (parents) and school environment.

Keywords

teacher’s role, classroom management, sociology learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaha, M. L., & Ramlah, S. (2023). Peran Guru dalam Pengelolaan Kelas untuk Mengoptimalkan Pembelajaran Sosiologi di SMA Taman Siswa Kodibangedo, Nusa Tenggara Timur. PENSOS : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pendidikan Sosiologi, 1(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.59098/pensos.v1i1.939

References

  1. Akoit, B. J., & Ihsanuddin. (2023). Teacher’s Strategy in Integrating Cultural Values in Sociology Learning at SMA Negeri 6 Kupang. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 4(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I1.870
  2. Balawala, P. G., & Idris. (2021). The Meaning of Sociologiy Learning with A Two Stray Type Cooperative Model. SocioEdu: Sociological Education , 2(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I2.484
  3. Eglitis, D. S., Buntman, F. L., & Alexander, D. V. (2016). Social Issues and Problem-based Learning in Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16643572
  4. Fahlberg, A. (2023). Decolonizing Sociology Through Collaboration, Co-Learning and Action: A Case for Participatory Action Research1. Sociological Forum, 38(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/SOCF.12867
  5. Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2017). Challenges in the Teaching of Sociology in Higher Education. Contributions to a Discussion. Societies, 7(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOC7040030
  6. Forsey, M. (2014). Learning to Stay? Mobile Modernity and the Sociology of Choice. Mobilities, 10(5), 764–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.927202
  7. Julyyanti, Y., Yusuf, N. W., Saldika, S. D., Syahrul, & Ramlah, S. (2022). Dilema Usaha Rasional Orangtua dalam Menumbuhkan Kesadaran Pendidikan pada Anak di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Journal on Teacher Education, 4(1), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.31004/JOTE.V4I1.5842
  8. Lucal, B. (2014). 2014 Hans O. Mauksch Address: Neoliberalism and Higher Education. Teaching Sociology, 43(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14556684
  9. Luna, Y. M., & Winters, S. A. (2017). “Why Did You Blend My Learning?” A Comparison of Student Success in Lecture and Blended Learning Introduction to Sociology Courses. Teaching Sociology, 45(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16685373
  10. Manza, J. (2023). Sociology for Beginners. Annual Review of Sociology, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-030420-124148
  11. Maswi, R. Z., Syahrul, & Datuk, A. (2022). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Sosiologi di Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bahri Ternate Kabupaten Alor. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 2395–2402. https://doi.org/10.31004/EDUKATIF.V4I2.2459
  12. Molina, M., & Garip, F. (2019). Machine Learning for Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-073117-041106
  13. Nnebedum, C. (2019). The Value of Integrating 21st Century Skills into the Enterprise of Teaching Sociology. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2019-0003
  14. Nomleni, R. (2023). The Correlation of Social Environment Toward Children’s Learning Achievement at SMA PGRI Kupang. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 4(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I1.871
  15. Raden, A., & Nurdin. (2021). Dimensions of Application of Cooperative Script Method in Sociology Learning. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 2(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I2.485
  16. Rahmawati, & Imrayani. (2023). The Role of Sociology Teacher in Overcoming Students’ Learning Difficulties at SMA Negeri 2 Sambi Rampa. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V4I1.873
  17. Sastri, A. (2021). Learning Dynamics of Sociology in Senior High School Through Jigsaw Cooperative Learning. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 2(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I1.234
  18. Sorokin, P. (2017). Vision and Mission of Sociology: Learning from the Russian Historical Experience. American Sociologist, 48(2), 135–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12108-016-9303-3/METRICS
  19. Suparman. (2021). The Role-Play for Child Care in Familial Entrepreneur in Enrekang Regency. SocioEdu: Sociological Education, 2(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.59098/SOCIOEDU.V2I2.483
  20. Syahrul, Arifin, & Datuk, A. (2021). The dilemma of Timorese education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Innovation in Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Opportunities, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003206019-28
  21. Syahrul, Zahrawati, F., & Nursaptini. (2022). Kritik Ideologi Pendidikan. Parepare: IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press. Retrieved from http://repository.iainpare.ac.id/4044/
  22. Vergés Bosch, N., Freude, L., & Camps Calvet, C. (2021). Service Learning with a Gender Perspective: Reconnecting Service Learning with Feminist Research and Pedagogy in Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 49(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X21993465